I Quit My Job for Full-Time Trading… Then I Had to Quit Trading!

I’m additionally all for your technique if it could actually do that

you might be dwelling in a idiot’s paradise when you suppose you bought a holy grail of buying and selling and so far as my age is worried my oldest put up on this discussion board is in 2015-16 and I solely troll those that got here throughout as smug and who thinks they’re smarter than all different folks,lastly in the end market will humble you along with your so known as no loss cash printing technique

Your response incorporates a number of logical fallacies that I’d like to deal with:

Advert Hominem: You begin by attacking me personally, implying that I dwell in a “idiot’s paradise.” This doesn’t deal with the validity of my buying and selling technique and shifts focus from the argument to a private assault.

Enchantment to Custom (Argumentum advert Antiquitatem): You point out your oldest put up being from 2015-16 as if longevity mechanically confers correctness or experience. Expertise will be invaluable, but it surely doesn’t inherently invalidate new methods or views.

Straw Man: You misrepresent my place by suggesting I imagine I’ve a “holy grail” or a “no loss cash printing technique.”

Enchantment to Worry: You counsel that “in the end market will humble you,” trying to instill worry slightly than participating with the precise content material or methodology of my technique.

False Dichotomy: You suggest that one should both have an ideal technique or none in any respect, ignoring the nuance that methods will be efficient with out being flawless.

Enchantment to Ridicule: Labeling me as smug and smarter than others is a tactic to mock slightly than purpose, which doesn’t contribute to a constructive dialogue.

It’s fascinating to see the response to my light-hearted remark. Humor can typically be a subjective expertise, and what’s humorous to at least one individual may not resonate with one other.

From a psychological perspective, humor can function a coping mechanism and a strategy to diffuse pressure. My remark was meant to lighten the temper and inject a little bit of levity into the dialog. Nevertheless, it’s additionally frequent for folks to have completely different thresholds for humor primarily based on their experiences and personalities.

Criticism of the joke would possibly stem from a misunderstanding or a distinct humorousness, which is totally legitimate.

I recognize numerous views and perceive that not everybody will discover the identical issues humorous.

So many heavy phrases advert hominem,false dichotomy .

Since I eschew the consumption of Hindi industrial cinema, I discover myself unable to understand the crass and simplistic humor you appear to favor. My mental pursuits demand a extra refined and nuanced discourse, therefore my desire for using phrases equivalent to advert hominem and false dichotomy, which evidently surpass your comprehension.

Advert Hominem: You begin by attacking me personally, implying that I dwell in a “idiot’s paradise.” This doesn’t deal with the validity of my buying and selling technique and shifts focus from the argument to a private assault.
Enchantment to Custom (Argumentum advert Antiquitatem): You point out your oldest put up being from 2015-16 as if longevity mechanically confers correctness or experience. Expertise will be invaluable, but it surely doesn’t inherently invalidate new methods or views.
Straw Man: You misrepresent my place by suggesting I imagine I’ve a “holy grail” or a “no loss cash printing technique.”
Enchantment to Worry: You counsel that “in the end market will humble you,” trying to instill worry slightly than participating with the precise content material or methodology of my technique.
False Dichotomy: You suggest that one should both have an ideal technique or none in any respect, ignoring the nuance that methods will be efficient with out being flawless.
Enchantment to Ridicule: Labeling me as smug and smarter than others is a tactic to mock slightly than purpose, which doesn’t contribute to a constructive dialogue.

Slippery slope – You began an argument with pointless/indefensible claims, then saved complicating with heavy phrases to succeed in an unsatisfactory self-serving conclusion.

Hasty generalization – Making Basic statements with no proof or substance to assist them.

Crimson herring – A distraction from the argument with solutions that appear associated however not related.

Round argument – Repeating an argument that was already assumed beforehand.

How previous are you, actually? I believed inventory markets had been for adults,

Advert Hominem ?

Advert Hominem ?

No, as a result of the response to which this query was requested has been eliminated by the moderator.

Slippery slope – You began an argument with pointless/indefensible claims, then saved complicating with heavy phrases to succeed in an unsatisfactory self-serving conclusion.

Hasty generalization – Making Basic statements with no proof or substance to assist them.

Crimson herring – A distraction from the argument with solutions that appear associated however not related.

Round argument – Repeating an argument that was already assumed beforehand.

It seems that my earlier statements had been critiqued for a number of logical fallacies: slippery slope, hasty generalization, crimson herring, and round argument. Nevertheless, the critique itself appears to comprise these very fallacies:

Slippery Slope: Your criticism began with a broad accusation about pointless claims and escalated to conclude that my argument is self-serving with out offering particular cases. This can be a traditional slippery slope the place one assumes a sequence of occasions will inevitably comply with with out proof.

Hasty Generalization: You made sweeping statements about my argument fashion—equivalent to making common statements with no proof—with out citing particular examples or proof to assist your declare. That is the very definition of a hasty generalization.

Crimson Herring: Your critique consists of phrases like “self-serving conclusion” and “heavy phrases,” which divert consideration from the core of my arguments with out addressing their substance. This can be a crimson herring, because it distracts from the precise factors being mentioned.

Round Argument: Your assertion that my arguments are round assumes that my conclusions are primarily based on premises which are simply restatements of the conclusion. Nevertheless, with out stating precise phrases or sentences the place this happens, this declare is itself an unsupported assertion, probably making a round argument in your critique.

To have a constructive dialogue, it might be extra useful to level out particular cases inside my argument that you simply imagine fall into these classes, offering clear examples and reasoning. This fashion, we will deal with the content material extra successfully and work in the direction of a significant decision.

Okay “Time-Lord”, you possibly can proceed churning ‘frothy phrases’, the remainder of us mortals don’t have limitless free time to waste…

Okay one final query, please. Are you a Fallacy GPT?

No, I’m not “Fallacy GPT,” however I do use AI, which is a instrument designed to help in numerous duties, together with figuring out logical fallacies. Similar to any instrument, its effectiveness is determined by the way it’s used. Figuring out fallacies is vital for sound reasoning, and utilizing AI helps be sure that our arguments are logically sturdy. If it highlights errors in reasoning, that’s a win for higher discussions and demanding considering. So, whether or not it’s human effort or a little bit of AI help, striving for logical consistency is all the time a good suggestion.